Reflections on the History of Chinese-North Korean Relations, and US-DPRK Relations Today

Sometimes we need to modify the questions we ask. The question “Is the Chinese Communist Party going to cut off North Korea?” results in a fairly predictable string of analyses — usually adding up to an answer of “no.”

Perhaps we might be better off by shifting perspectives, asking “To what extent does the regime in Pyongyang trust its counterpart in Beijing?” Such a question can at least get us out from under the weight of a nuclear-centred approach, provide a more holistic outlook on the Party-Party relations that have predominated in Sino-North Korean relations, and give writers like myself an excuse to get away from the Yalu/Tumen River border region as some kind of holy wax tablet that can provide the necessary data.

With this in mind, this past week I published a long essay with Foreign Policy on Pyongyang’s outlook on the Chinese Communist Party.

The Foreign Policy essay gestated over a three-month period, and was beautifully edited by James Palmer. Having just completed and submitted a new research essay to a peer-reviewed scholarly journal — the manuscript is one of the “10,000 word / 150 footnote” variety — there is something much cleaner about a writing process that begins with the inclusion of a host of links and ends with an essay that contains no hyperlinks or footnotes whatsoever.

The following day, I participated in an hour-long televised debate with Ambassador Christopher Hill on the subject of US-North Korean relations and geopolitics in Northeast Asia generally.

Among the problems I brought to the table were 1.) China’s domestic discourse (among both think-tanks and in the state press) on the THAAD missile defence system, 2.) the absence of human rights critique of North Korea from the Trump administration, 3.) unharmonious elements in US-ROK-Japan relations, and 4.) China’s attitude toward UN sanctions enforcement.

For detail-obsessed readers who favour empirical follow-up over on-air pontificating, I can only offer this 7 March text of Xi Jinping’s appearance with the Liaoning delegation as a preliminary means of seeing if earlier argument of mine holds up.

Finally, moving out of the inevitably narcissistic mode of self-promotion, I found the following podcast on Chinese-North Korean relations to be both informative and extraordinary. Bonnie Glaser interviews Yun Sun, a fellow at the Stimson Center at Stanford University who appears to be nicely plugged in with the Beijing policy scene; certainly her careful and well-informed discourse indicates as much. Her point about Beijing wanting to maintain the DPRK post-Kim family regime, made twice and very clearly, was a bit of a revelation for me.

Image credit: Domestic coal production in North Korea, broadcast by Chosun Central Television on 6 March 2017. 

One thought on “Reflections on the History of Chinese-North Korean Relations, and US-DPRK Relations Today

  1. So often one hears these days a Freidmanite view of the Chinese Communist Party that goes something like this: Unconcerned with petty Western niceties like free elections and ideologies the like the CCP is able to calmly coolly and rationally pick “what works.” We Yanks are obsessing over Trump tweets while the CCP is making the high speed rail lines run on time, etc. Well if they really believe they can create a Chinese puppet state out of post Kim North Korea, they’re more delusional than I thought. They would take the ruins of the sacred Paektusan bloodline and expect there to be a North Korea afterward? In Jang Jin-Sung’s memoir he states that all North Koreans are obliged to learn a poem equating Kim Il-Sung with the state. I subscribe to BR Myers’s view of North Korea as a state that values racial purity above all else. South Korea is not criticized because of its failure to adhere to Marxism it’s criticized because it is the puppet state of a foreign great power. They expect to replace thhis Hirohito like “Let us protect Kim Jong-Il with our lives!” country and turn it into a state that values “win-win cooperation 21st century innovation or whatever the cliche du jour is from Beijing. Aside from this, North Korea would be a bottomless money pit, a thousand times worse than Tibet. If I were in the US or South Korean governments I would throw roses at Chinese soldiers feet as they crossed the river. North Korea as a Chinese puppet could not last.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s